![]() |
|
Feature Request: Analysing Tracks and calculated overall ascent - Printable Version +- RouteConverter Forum (https://forum.routeconverter.com) +-- Forum: Users (https://forum.routeconverter.com/forum-17.html) +--- Forum: English: Discussions (https://forum.routeconverter.com/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: Feature Request: Analysing Tracks and calculated overall ascent (/thread-642.html) |
Feature Request: Analysing Tracks and calculated overall ascent - rose28357 - 21.05.2010 I recorded a track during a trip in the alps (Kleinwalsertal). When i opened "Analyse" RouteConverter calculated a overall ascent of 2181 m. But we did not went that up and down ! Of course does our WintTex WBT-202 has fluctuations in measuring the high out of the GPS signal. Is there a possibility to add something like a smooth function to get a better result for elevation profile? Can you also add a analyze function for speed over distance? i add my test case data in WBT-202 *.tes format. RE: Feature Request: Analysing Tracks and calculated overall ascent - robekras - 23.05.2010 Hi Ditmar, Maybe the new elevation profile method will better match your vision. Please see the attachment. The new method uses the SRTM-hgt files with interpolation and leads, in your case, to 1399 m instead of 2181 m. But I think Christian still needs some time to incorporate the new method. For background information please see the following thread (in German): http://www.routeconverter.de/forum/thread-611.html Cheers Robert RE: Feature Request: Analysing Tracks and calculated overall ascent - rose28357 - 24.05.2010 (23.05.2010, 08:20)robekras Wrote: Maybe the new elevation profile method will better match your vision.Yes that looks much more reasonable. Thank you. |