03.06.2010, 09:17
Hi,
kml files can have the following setup for "Point".
longitude, lattitude, height as in
<Point><coordinates>8.199620,46.843810,0</coordinates></Point>
or longitude, lattitude as in
<Point><coordinates>8.199620,46.843810</coordinates></Point>
(kml 2.x version)
Routeconverter interprets the second format with only two coordinates incorrectly. It interprets the first <Point> correctly. Consecutive <Points> miss the longitude as Routeconverter seems to add the longitude as height (displayed as an integer). The longitude field remains empty.
Next to that: When this happens also the <name> blah blah </name> is no longer displayed.
(as in <Placemark> <name> blah blah </name> <Point> <coordinates> long,lat </coordinates> </Point> </Placemark>)
kml files can have the following setup for "Point".
longitude, lattitude, height as in
<Point><coordinates>8.199620,46.843810,0</coordinates></Point>
or longitude, lattitude as in
<Point><coordinates>8.199620,46.843810</coordinates></Point>
(kml 2.x version)
Routeconverter interprets the second format with only two coordinates incorrectly. It interprets the first <Point> correctly. Consecutive <Points> miss the longitude as Routeconverter seems to add the longitude as height (displayed as an integer). The longitude field remains empty.
Next to that: When this happens also the <name> blah blah </name> is no longer displayed.
(as in <Placemark> <name> blah blah </name> <Point> <coordinates> long,lat </coordinates> </Point> </Placemark>)