06.04.2022, 14:51
Hello,
awesome program! I tried to get though it and got "nearly there" but there's probably something more I am missing.
I have a large collections of routes (they are in .gpx format, apparently created with compeGPS, one file for each route) and I need to convert them into tracks (still gpx files, but in track format vs. route).
I can load many routes into RouteConverter all right, and I can save them all in a single .gpx file containing all the segments, but in order fot the result to be a "track" and not a "route" I seem to have to manually set the "track" type in every single list position.
After doing so, I do obtain a single gpx file with all separate tracks inside, but this would require that I select and set to "track" everyone of possibly 500+ list positions! Obviously not feasible...
I wonder if there's a way to obtain the same result with a reasonable number of operations (say "all tracks"...)
Or maybe there's a better way altogether (or a different tool?) to get the same result, which I may have missed.
Thank anybody for any suggestions!
awesome program! I tried to get though it and got "nearly there" but there's probably something more I am missing.
I have a large collections of routes (they are in .gpx format, apparently created with compeGPS, one file for each route) and I need to convert them into tracks (still gpx files, but in track format vs. route).
I can load many routes into RouteConverter all right, and I can save them all in a single .gpx file containing all the segments, but in order fot the result to be a "track" and not a "route" I seem to have to manually set the "track" type in every single list position.
After doing so, I do obtain a single gpx file with all separate tracks inside, but this would require that I select and set to "track" everyone of possibly 500+ list positions! Obviously not feasible...
I wonder if there's a way to obtain the same result with a reasonable number of operations (say "all tracks"...)
Or maybe there's a better way altogether (or a different tool?) to get the same result, which I may have missed.
Thank anybody for any suggestions!