23.05.2010, 08:20
Hi Ditmar,
Maybe the new elevation profile method will better match your vision.
Please see the attachment.
The new method uses the SRTM-hgt files with interpolation and leads,
in your case, to 1399 m instead of 2181 m.
But I think Christian still needs some time to incorporate the new
method.
For background information please see the following thread (in German):
http://www.routeconverter.de/forum/thread-611.html
Cheers
Robert
Maybe the new elevation profile method will better match your vision.
Please see the attachment.
The new method uses the SRTM-hgt files with interpolation and leads,
in your case, to 1399 m instead of 2181 m.
But I think Christian still needs some time to incorporate the new
method.
For background information please see the following thread (in German):
http://www.routeconverter.de/forum/thread-611.html
Cheers
Robert
